Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemenuhan Biaya Perkara akibat Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial
Authors
DOI
10.59017/setara.v3i2.377
Keywords:
Court Costs, Industrial Relations Court, Legal Protection, Execution, Legal CertaintyAbstract
This article examines legal protection concerning the recovery of court costs in industrial relations disputes after a judgment has ordered the losing party to bear those costs. The issue arises because the plaintiff usually advances the case deposit at the beginning of the proceedings, while the operative part of the judgment often only states that the losing party is ordered to pay court costs without clearly specifying to whom payment must be made. Using normative juridical research supported by a case approach, the article analyzes the legal framework of court fees under the HIR, Law Number 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, and relevant judicial practice. The study finds that the absence of a specific formulation regarding reimbursement of advanced court fees creates uncertainty for both the winning and losing parties and weakens legal protection in the execution stage. The article argues that clearer judicial formulations and administrative guidance are necessary so that court cost awards in industrial relations cases can be effectively enforced and fairly restored to the party that initially advanced them.
References
Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia.
Kansil, C. S. T. (1980). Pengantar ilmu hukum dan tata hukum Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
Purwaji, A., dkk. (2016). Pengantar akuntansi 1 (Edisi 2). Salemba Empat.
Berutu, L. (2020). Mewujudkan peradilan sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan dengan e-court. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 5(1).
Engkus, & Nasrudin, R. (2019). Implementasi kebijakan layanan pembebasan biaya perkara hukum bagi masyarakat tidak mampu di Pengadilan Agama Purwakarta tahun 2017. Politicon: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 1(2).
Ismail, & Hapsoro, F. L. (2022). Penegasan penentuan jeda waktu bagi mantan terpidana dalam pencalonan kepala daerah. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1).
Rahajo, J. (2022). Sistem informasi akuntansi penerimaan biaya perkara pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Ilmu Data, 2(8).
Shoffa, N. F., & Kushidayati, L. (2022). Analisis daluarsa sisa panjar biaya perkara perspektif hukum positif dan hukum ekonomi syariah. Jurnal ICCoLaSS, 2(1).
Syofia, N. (2015). Eksekusi pembayaran biaya perkara kepada tergugat yang kalah oleh panitera di Sumatera Barat [Tesis, Universitas Andalas].
Yusri, D., Sani, A., & Sakdiah, K. (2020). Pelatihan pelayanan perkara prodeo dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Jurnal ABDIMASA Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(1).
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online. Panjar. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://kbbi.web.id/panjar
Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Membayar panjar biaya perkara semudah update status. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from situs resmi Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Hukumonline. Siapa yang membayar biaya perkara jika gugatan dikabulkan sebagian. Retrieved January 13, 2023, from situs resmi Hukumonline.
Herzien Indonesisch Reglement (HIR).
Rechtsreglement Buitengewesten (RBg).
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.
Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor KMA/032/SK/IV/2006 tentang Pemberlakuan Buku II Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Pengadilan, beserta pembaruannya yang relevan.
