Perlindungan Hukum bagi Investor yang Mengalami Kerugian Tidak Sah akibat Praktik Insider Trading di Pasar
DOI
10.59017/setara.v4i1.397Keywords:
Investor Protection, Insider Trading, Capital Market, Legal Certainty, DisgorgementAbstract
This article examines legal protection for investors who suffer unlawful losses due to insider trading in the Indonesian capital market. The issue is important because trading based on non-public material information distorts the principle of disclosure, undermines market fairness, and places ordinary investors in a structurally disadvantaged position. Using normative juridical research with statutory and case-based support, the article reviews Law Number 8 of 1995 on Capital Markets and Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65/POJK.04/2020 on disgorgement and investor compensation. The study finds that investor protection under the Capital Market Law operates through preventive and repressive mechanisms, including supervision, disclosure obligations, inspection authority, and administrative or civil sanctions. However, proof of insider trading remains difficult, especially when information moves through indirect recipients or informal channels. The article concludes that POJK Number 65/POJK.04/2020 strengthens legal certainty by creating a mechanism to recover unlawful gains and compensate harmed investors, but more detailed standards on insider categories, material information, and enforcement coordination are still needed.
References
Anwar, J. (2005). Pasar modal sebagai sarana pembiayaan dan investasi. Alumni.
Gisymar, N. A. (1999). Insider trading dalam transaksi efek. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sitompul, A., Sitompul, Z., & Nasution, B. (2007). Insider trading: Kejahatan di pasar modal. Books Terrace & Library.
Dewi, I. A. C. K., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap investor untuk menghindari kerugian akibat praktik manipulasi pasar dalam pasar modal. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3(3).
Disurya Suryati, R. (2017). Pengembangan jaring jerat hukum dalam upaya perlindungan investor atas praktik insider trading: Kajian terhadap kebijakan dan kinerja Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Simbur Cahaya, 24(2).
Ismail, & Hapsoro, F. L. (2020). Pengusungan calon anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah sebagai bentuk representasi daerah. Jurnal Yudisial, 13(1), 37--53.
Junaedi, A. (2020). Tindak pidana insider trading dalam praktik pasar modal Indonesia. Media Iuris, 3(3).
Khoirunnisaa, N. F., & Masnun, M. A. (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi investor terhadap insider trading dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal. Jurnal Hukum.
Patrianto, F. H., & Hartono, D. (2021). Aspek hukum praktik insider trading terhadap investor dalam pasar modal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6.
Pravanta, A. R., & Gorda, A. A. A. N. S. R. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban terhadap tindak pidana pelaku insider trading menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal. Magister Hukum Udayana, 8.
Ramadani, R. (2022). Analisis atas konsep disgorgement dan disgorgement fund.
Simbolon, A. (2019). Insider trading menimbulkan persaingan usaha tidak sehat.
Wantu, F. M. (2007). Antinomi dalam penegakan hukum oleh hakim. Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum, 19(3).
Riyanto, & Suwardi, A. (2021, July 18). Insider trading dan kendalanya di pasar modal. Binus Business Law. Tersedia pada https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2021/07/18.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 65/POJK.04/2020 tentang Pengembalian Keuntungan Tidak Sah dan Dana Kompensasi Kerugian Investor di Bidang Pasar Modal.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal.
